pyqt vs pyside

2025

3 min read

·

19-03-2025

21

0

Share

Choosing the right GUI (Graphical User Interface) toolkit can significantly impact your Python application development. Both PyQt and PySide are popular choices offering cross-platform capabilities, allowing you to create applications that run on Windows, macOS, and Linux with minimal code changes. But which one is best for your project? This article will delve into the key differences between PyQt and PySide to help you make an informed decision.

Understanding the Fundamentals: PyQt and PySide

Both PyQt and PySide are Python bindings for Qt, a powerful and mature C++ framework for creating GUIs. Qt itself is renowned for its rich feature set, excellent performance, and cross-platform compatibility. However, the licensing and development behind each binding differ, leading to important distinctions.

PyQt: The Veteran

PyQt is a commercial offering from Riverbank Computing. It provides comprehensive access to all of Qt's features, including advanced capabilities like Qt3D and QtMultimedia. A commercial license is required for commercial use, while open-source projects can utilize the GPL license. The GPL license, however, imposes certain restrictions on the distribution of your application.

Pros of PyQt:

• Mature and feature-rich: PyQt boasts a longer history and wider community support, resulting in abundant resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries.
• Excellent documentation: The documentation is generally considered thorough and well-maintained.
• Broad range of features: Access to nearly every aspect of the Qt framework.

Cons of PyQt:

• Commercial licensing: For commercial applications, a commercial license is needed, which can be costly.
• GPL licensing restrictions: Using the GPL license can restrict your application’s distribution.

PySide (Qt for Python): The Open-Source Challenger

PySide, now officially known as Qt for Python, is developed by The Qt Company, the same company behind the Qt framework itself. It is entirely open-source, using the LGPL license for most components, making it a more attractive option for open-source projects and commercial ventures that want flexibility in their distribution.

Pros of PySide:

• Open-source licensing: The LGPL license offers significantly more freedom in distributing your applications. This is a major advantage for commercial projects.
• Official support: Being directly developed and supported by the Qt Company ensures ongoing maintenance and updates.
• Improved API consistency: PySide aims for a more consistent and intuitive API compared to some older versions of PyQt.

Cons of PySide:

• Relatively newer: While rapidly maturing, it has a slightly smaller community compared to PyQt. This might mean fewer readily available third-party libraries or solutions.
• Slightly less mature ecosystem: Fewer readily available third-party resources compared to PyQt, though this is rapidly changing.

Key Differences Summarized: PyQt vs PySide

Which One Should You Choose?

The best choice depends heavily on your project's needs and licensing requirements:

• Choose PyQt if: You need immediate access to a large community and extensive resources, and the commercial licensing cost isn't a major constraint. A long history of stability is a plus.

• Choose PySide (Qt for Python) if: Open-source licensing is crucial, you prioritize freedom in distribution, and you are comfortable with a slightly smaller but rapidly growing community. The future of Qt development strongly favors PySide.

Beyond the Basics: Practical Considerations

• Learning Curve: Both have a similar learning curve, although finding tutorials might be easier for PyQt due to its longer history.
• Performance: Both offer excellent performance comparable to native applications. Minor differences are generally negligible for most applications.
• Future-proofing: The Qt Company's direct involvement makes PySide a more secure long-term bet for future development and updates.

Ultimately, both PyQt and PySide are powerful tools capable of building robust and visually appealing applications. Carefully weigh the licensing implications, community support, and your project’s specific requirements to make the best choice for your needs. Testing both might even be beneficial to determine which API style you prefer.